Are Thoughts Ever Experiences?
by Peter V. Forrest
The recent debate in philosophy of mind over whether thought has its own distinctive phenomenology,
cognitive phenomenology (CP), has led to a sharp division between proponents and
skeptics of CP. This paper critically examines an ambitious argument against the existence of CP,
which is based on a particular view of the temporal structure of thought. The argument, roughly, is
that experiences, those mental entities that have phenomenology, persist as processes, while thoughts,
on the other hand, are non-processive
states or events. So no thoughts are experiences. The present
paper attacks the claim that thoughts never temporally unfold as processes.