List journal issues    
 
 
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to APQ

Article

Volume 51 • Number 1

January 2014



 

 

Monitoring, Testimony, and a Challenge from Social Psychology


by Adam Green


In a recent paper entitled “Against Credibility,” Joe Shieber points out that there is a vast literature in psychology that has direct bearing on the epistemology of testimony relating to our ability to detect the trustworthiness, deceit, or competence of testifiers (Shieber 2012). Despite the fact that testimony has received a great deal of attention in contemporary epistemology, this psychological literature has been largely ignored. Shieber seeks to rectify this deficit, and he holds that it is important to do so because the empirical picture painted by this literature is markedly different from the one assumed by contemporary epistemologists. According to Shieber, what one should learn from the empirical literature is that there are no marks of credibility or disreputability in testifiers to which we are well attuned. On this basis, Shieber argues that we should reject the idea that testimonial knowledge requires monitoring for signs of reliability. I am in agreement with Shieber over the importance of empirical work in the psychological sciences to philosophical theorizing about testimony. I want to draw a different moral from this literature, however. I argue that Shieber’s interpretation of the data is too narrowly focused on synchronic judgments concerning the character and motivation of informants. The empirical literature does, indeed, appear to show that we are bad at making such judgments. If, however, one focuses on sensitivity to the relative risk or safety of social situations and on the diachronic updating that accompanies long-term relationships, then one can see one’s way clear of Shieber’s argument.


view PDF
 

 

 

 
Home | Issue Index
 
© 2014 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in American Philosophical Quarterly is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the American Philosophical Quarterly database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.

American Philosophical Quarterly is published by the University of Illinois Press on behalf of North American Philosophical Publications.

ISSN: 2152-1123