List journal issues    
 
 
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to APQ

Article

Volume 49 • Number 3

July 2012



 

 

Right-Making and Reference


by Joseph Long


Either no normative ethical theory is true, or the following prominent version of the causal theory of reference, held by certain moral philosophers and philosophers of science, is false:

(CTR) A general term [T] rigidly designates a property F if the use of [T] by competent users of the term is causally regulated by F.

According to (CTR), the term "is water," for example, refers to the purely descriptive property of being composed of H2O and does so because being composed of H2O causally regulates the competent use "is water." (For ease of discussion, assume that any user of a term mentioned hereafter is competent with the term.) Now, a normative ethical theory attempts to specify which purely descriptive properties are fundamental right-making properties (FRM-properties, henceforth). An FRM-property is a purely descriptive property that, if possessed by an action, ultimately explains the action's being right. Utilitarianism, for example, holds that there is exactly one FRM-property, namely, maximizing pleasure. The view of Moore (1993 [1903]), by contrast, held that promoting pleasure, promoting knowledge, and promoting beauty are all FRM-properties.


view PDF
 

 

 

 
Home | Issue Index
 
© 2012 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in American Philosophical Quarterly is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the American Philosophical Quarterly database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.

ISSN: 2152-1123