List journal issues    
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to APQ


Volume 46 • Number 2

April 2009



Content Internalism About Indexical Thought

by Michael Pelczar

Properly understood, content internalism is the thesis that any difference between the representational contents of two individuals' mental states reduces to a difference in those individuals' intrinsic properties. Some of the strongest arguments against internalism turn on the possibility for two doppelgangers— perfect physical and phenomenal duplicates— to differ with respect to the contents of those of their mental states that they can express using terms such as "I," "here," and "now." In this paper, we grant the stated possibility but deny that it poses any threat to internalism. despite their similarities, doppelgangers differ in some of their intrinsic properties, and it is to such intrinsic differences that differences of indexical content reduce.

view PDF



Home | Issue Index
© 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in American Philosophical Quarterly is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the American Philosophical Quarterly database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.

American Philosophical Quarterly is published by the University of Illinois Press on behalf of North American Philosophical Publications.

ISSN: 2152-1123